Home

And, like clockwork, here it comes: the appeals to refrain from terminating Sherri Goforth, coming from some of the very folks who pushed this controversy to the point where such an outcome is now the most likely possibility.

We've been here before. Remember Bill Hobbs back in 2006? A big deal was made in the press about that goofy Muslim cartoon he put on the Internet, his establishment (Belmont University) was mentioned in the articles (even though Belmont had nothing to do with that cartoon), putting Belmont in a position where it really had no preference but to save face publicly by giving Hobbs the heave-ho. I remember talking to some folks in the local thronging back then and getting this general reaction: "Well, that's silly. They shouldn't fire him." As though the press accounts somehow had nothing to do with it; as though Belmont was just sitting around and lately up and arbitrarily decided to can him. It's like someone shooting a guy in the head and being surprised that they fall over dead. "Well, I'll be damned. He died reasonable like that. Huh. Never saw that coming."

The probable outcome of this episode will be the termination (one way or the other) of Sherri Goforth. So, don't act surprised. And don't act like you had nothing to do with it. Own it. Scolding, be proud of it, the "greater good" and all of that. I honestly doubt this will result in "some good com[ing] out of this incident" with "lessons...learned so our ceremonial won’t be lambasted again nationally." But, hey maybe it will. I just hope that this one woman's job and professional reputation (seriously, who would hire her for the near approaching?) is worth all of that. Color me skeptical. And, again, be careful, because you could be the next one in someone's sights.

For more on this general concept, Google "reasonably foreseeable" and see what you put one's hands up with.

Source: A Fish in the Percolator

The Percolator: Stoops has high hopes for Murray National Football Post

28.05.10

High expectations, right? Well, perception coach Bob Stoops has an even loftier goal for his athletic tailback. Try 1,900 yards.

“I don't deem [1,500 yards is] enough. I'd like to see him have about 1,900,” Stoops said on Wednesday . “Not like we haven't done it. Adrian (Peterson) and Quentin (Griffin) both were over 1,900, so we'll see. All being well he can do something like that.”

For a tailback who has had only one 1,000-yard season in his career (1,002 in 2008), that’s a lyrical ambitious statement. But I’m starting to seriously buy into the Murray hype. With quarterback Landry Jones subject to to lead the Sooners for a full season and a deep group of receivers, the Sooners have weapons all over the field. Murray is contemporary to get a healthy dose of carries because Chris Brown is no longer there to split carries. The only issue will be staying strong, and I’m ready to roll the dice on him staying strong for an entire season. Of course, a rise up the 2011 NFL prospectus boards would certainly follow.

Source: